Heterosexual reproduction is the method by which most visible organisms reproduce. The word “sexuality” and the words “sexual orientation” are modern day constructs that serve to create separate compartments of mind and behavior that are said to exist outside biology. We do not talk about the sexuality or sexual orientation of dogs, cats, elephants, or chimps instead we refer to their biological sex, which is indicated by their genitalia.
Genitalia, along with the physiological components necessary for reproduction are genetically determined. Reproductive sex among animals is instinctive and is not dependent on learning. The conformation and functioning of the genitalia invite and facilitate sexual intercourse between male and female of their respective species.
Quadruped species are tightly bound to obtain sexual relief through intercourse with the opposite sex, while the bipedal animals find that they can obtain sexual relief through various simulations of sexual intercourse. But the basic, instinctual systems related to gender still form the basis of sexual activity – for the male, arousal, intromission, and ejaculation and for the female arousal, submission, and sometimes orgasm. Nature provides man with complementary sexual organs along with complex physiological actions that facilitate reproductive sex, but do not preclude non-reproductive sex. Complex physiological actions mediate sexual interest, attraction, receptivity, and aggressiveness and are closely related to fertility but are not reliant on a fertile partner to function.
This reproductive system has worked to ensure the survival and proliferation of the human species partly because the system contains many redundancies. One such redundancy is the relatively loose connection between sexual behaviors and fertility. In the human female ovulation is not evident to the male while in many species estrus is made obvious to the male through sight, smell, and behavior of the female, all of which trigger the male to seek intercourse with her. Reproductive success in man, however, does not depend on the male reading such signals of fertility, instead the male seeks intercourse without such clear signals allowing the male’s independent sexual drive to determine his sexual behavior without regard to the fertility of his partner. The human male’s drive to seek sexual relief is unremitting, and relatively indiscriminant compared to animals with obvious estrus.
Humanity’s reproductive success shows clearly that the vast majority of human males respond sexually to female fertility signs such as health and youth and possibly more subtle signs of scent, body conformation, and behavior. But the redundancy in our reproductive system allows sexual behaviors like masturbation that are not triggered by the presence of a fertile female. Such non-reproductive sexual behavior would be intolerable in a system that relies on a single ejaculation to fertilize an infrequent ovum.
Masturbation, homosexuality, bisexuality, voyeurism, exhibitionism, sado-masochism, fetishism, pedophilia, bestiality, prostitution, etc. are the by-products of our particular type of reproductive system, a system relatively loosely connected to fertility and amplified by human imagination. There is no need to postulate a genetic glitch, the environment of the womb, the number and sex of siblings, the psychological dynamics of the family, or estrogen-mimicking pollution to explain these behaviors. Deviant behaviors are driven by the same hormones, effected by the same organs, and responsive to the same rudimentary tactile stimuli as reproductive sex. With the exception of the defective, deformed and the diseased we are all “born” to participate in reproductive sex. Deviations are not inborn but experiential, circumstantial, and are not manifest until a person reaches sexual maturity. Reproduction is an essential part of our life cycle and though some of us will be unable to participate in it, no one should act to preclude that possibility in another by suggesting that he or she has a different “orientation”.
Friday, January 4, 2008
Friday, January 19, 2007
Obamania
The Barack Obama Show has been prepared for a brain dead public, a public that adopts media slogans as if they are thinking their own thoughts, even parroting the media words like charm and charisma. Quite suddenly all important issues have evaporated to make room for endless discussion of this latest, media-fabricated celebrity.
The one invention Jews can honestly take credit for is the celebrity. Barack Obama is their invention just as surely as Paris Hilton is their invention.
The methods of the Jewish impresario have been used in politics for a very long time, but we are a little slow to catch on. Most Americans wake up to find Barak Obama on the cover of Newsweek and they are embarrassed when they realize that they don't know who this guy is. They are embarrassed! So they Google the name only to find that they are thirteen million results behind the curve. These Americans like to think of themselves as intelligent and informed, so they are not embarrassed to be ignorant of J Lo, but they foolishly believe that the political celebrity and the movie celebrity are not cooked up in the same kitchen.
Being on the lookout for "black" talent is the responsibility of every well placed Jew in academia. and you can be sure that someone at Occidental College saw this mulatto as promising material. Recall that Condoleezza Rice was the protege of of Madeleine Albright's father at the backwater University of Denver and was moved along a trajectory that belied any authentic qualifications to become the first, black, female Secretary of State.
Obama was "discovered" at a small liberal arts college and was transferred to a big name Jewish school to be groomed for his future. We are not told what Obama's interests were in his two years at Occidental, but by the time he was transferred to Columbia University it was clear that his interests had been given political direction and Jewish management. A major in international relations, a Harvard law degree, being chosen the first "black" editor of the Harvard Law Review, a nice summer job for a top Chicago law firm, a stint doing some "community service" - all are the "bona fides" of the chosen.
At least since the twentieth century the Jews have made use of the special status of Blacks to front for their own, varied and nefarious schemes. Blacks were used as a pretext for the Civil War: They were used to crush white political power in the South during Reconstruction. With the Great Migration they were used to counter the fledgling power of white labor unions and the homogeneity of whites in northern cities. They were used to destroy local control of public education. They have been used as a massive voting block to promote the Democrats' candidates and issues. They were used as the cause celebre to push affirmative action on our universities assuring an enormous leap in Jewish and female enrollment at our top schools. And their status as the descendants of slaves has been used to give the cloak of righteousness to every minority group from homosexuals to illegal aliens.
The phenomenon of Barack Obama is to be used to support the false consciousness of white people that has been relentlessly cultivated in the last century.
Obama is to be used to fool everyone, especially Blacks, into thinking of him as a black man. His good qualities will be identified as examples of black intelligence, black accomplishment, and black attractiveness. The contribution of his white genes and his white upbringing will be ignored except when necessary as an ad hoc promotion of race-mixing.
A true champion of Blacks' interests is never chosen by the Jews to become their celebrity because he cannot be trusted to put the Jews' interests first. They chose the tractable mulatto, W.E.B. Dubois, to be their office boy at the NAACP because they knew he was not an advocate for the preservation of the race or the interests of Black people, but would support "assimilation". On the other hand, they did everything in their power to obstruct the full-blooded African, Marcus Garvey, because he was a true advocate of Africans for the advancement of Africa.
Barack Obama is not a black man. He is not a white man. He is a contrivance designed to confound us. His celebrity will reinforce every dishonest argument in favor of diversity, affirmative action, race-mixing, integration, third world immigration, the "rights" of sexual deviants, abortion "rights", the abolition of Christian holidays, symbols and ideals, the support of globalism, the insertion of Talmudic ideas into our public life, support for Israel and Zionism, the falsification of history, and the worship of Mammon as a replacement for all we have lost as a people.
The one invention Jews can honestly take credit for is the celebrity. Barack Obama is their invention just as surely as Paris Hilton is their invention.
The methods of the Jewish impresario have been used in politics for a very long time, but we are a little slow to catch on. Most Americans wake up to find Barak Obama on the cover of Newsweek and they are embarrassed when they realize that they don't know who this guy is. They are embarrassed! So they Google the name only to find that they are thirteen million results behind the curve. These Americans like to think of themselves as intelligent and informed, so they are not embarrassed to be ignorant of J Lo, but they foolishly believe that the political celebrity and the movie celebrity are not cooked up in the same kitchen.
Being on the lookout for "black" talent is the responsibility of every well placed Jew in academia. and you can be sure that someone at Occidental College saw this mulatto as promising material. Recall that Condoleezza Rice was the protege of of Madeleine Albright's father at the backwater University of Denver and was moved along a trajectory that belied any authentic qualifications to become the first, black, female Secretary of State.
Obama was "discovered" at a small liberal arts college and was transferred to a big name Jewish school to be groomed for his future. We are not told what Obama's interests were in his two years at Occidental, but by the time he was transferred to Columbia University it was clear that his interests had been given political direction and Jewish management. A major in international relations, a Harvard law degree, being chosen the first "black" editor of the Harvard Law Review, a nice summer job for a top Chicago law firm, a stint doing some "community service" - all are the "bona fides" of the chosen.
At least since the twentieth century the Jews have made use of the special status of Blacks to front for their own, varied and nefarious schemes. Blacks were used as a pretext for the Civil War: They were used to crush white political power in the South during Reconstruction. With the Great Migration they were used to counter the fledgling power of white labor unions and the homogeneity of whites in northern cities. They were used to destroy local control of public education. They have been used as a massive voting block to promote the Democrats' candidates and issues. They were used as the cause celebre to push affirmative action on our universities assuring an enormous leap in Jewish and female enrollment at our top schools. And their status as the descendants of slaves has been used to give the cloak of righteousness to every minority group from homosexuals to illegal aliens.
The phenomenon of Barack Obama is to be used to support the false consciousness of white people that has been relentlessly cultivated in the last century.
Obama is to be used to fool everyone, especially Blacks, into thinking of him as a black man. His good qualities will be identified as examples of black intelligence, black accomplishment, and black attractiveness. The contribution of his white genes and his white upbringing will be ignored except when necessary as an ad hoc promotion of race-mixing.
A true champion of Blacks' interests is never chosen by the Jews to become their celebrity because he cannot be trusted to put the Jews' interests first. They chose the tractable mulatto, W.E.B. Dubois, to be their office boy at the NAACP because they knew he was not an advocate for the preservation of the race or the interests of Black people, but would support "assimilation". On the other hand, they did everything in their power to obstruct the full-blooded African, Marcus Garvey, because he was a true advocate of Africans for the advancement of Africa.
Barack Obama is not a black man. He is not a white man. He is a contrivance designed to confound us. His celebrity will reinforce every dishonest argument in favor of diversity, affirmative action, race-mixing, integration, third world immigration, the "rights" of sexual deviants, abortion "rights", the abolition of Christian holidays, symbols and ideals, the support of globalism, the insertion of Talmudic ideas into our public life, support for Israel and Zionism, the falsification of history, and the worship of Mammon as a replacement for all we have lost as a people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)